Friday, 6 November 2009

Johnald's Fantastical Daily Link Splurge

Johnald's Fantastical Daily Link Splurge


Close Encounter with Saturn Moon’s Fantastic Plumage

Posted: 06 Nov 2009 09:56 AM PST

enceladus_plume

Earlier this week, NASA's Cassini spacecraft took its deepest dive ever through the center of the icy plume shooting out from the southern pole of Saturn's moon Enceladus.

NASA reports that the spacecraft survived Monday's flyby in good health, and is now transmitting eagerly awaited data and images back to Earth. At its closest point, Cassini dipped just 60 miles above the surface of Enceladus. Although previous flybys have gotten even closer, this trip included the spacecraft's deepest foray into the south polar plume, which was discovered in 2005 and is known to contain water vapor, sodium and organic molecules.

As Cassini gathers more and more information about the composition and density of the plume, scientists hope they'll be able to identify the source of the gas. If the source is a liquid ocean underneath Enceladus' icy crust, it could harbor life if conditions are right. To fly through the plume safely, however, mission managers had to conduct extensive pre-trip studies and make sure the spacecraft didn't use too much propellant.

Cassini captured the unprocessed image above using its narrow-angle camera at a distance of about 120,000 miles away from the moon. As sunlight bounces off the moon's crescent edge, it highlights the mysterious misty plume at the southern pole.

Image: NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute

See Also:

Follow us on Twitter @wiredscience, and on Facebook.

Out of the Blue: Islands Seen From Space

Posted: 05 Nov 2009 05:00 PM PST

<< previous image | next image >>

Islands are some of the most beautiful, peaceful, violent, desolate and unique places on Earth. While experiencing a tropical island from its sandy beaches, or a volcanic island from its towering peaks is wonderful, experiencing them from above can be inspiring as well.

We've collected images taken by astronauts and satellites from space of some of the most interesting islands on the planet.

Atafu Atoll, Tokelau, Pacific Ocean

Around 500 people live on Atafu Atoll, mostly in a village that can be seen on the corner in the left of the image above. Atafu is just five miles wide and is the smallest of three atolls in the Tokelau Islands, a New Zealand territory.

Atafu is made up of coral reefs that surrounded the flanks of a volcano that has since become inactive and submerged. Like many tropical atolls, Atafu is very low lying and vulnerable to sea-level rise. This photograph was taken by astronauts aboard the International Space Station in January.

Image: NASA

Gene Therapy Halts Fatal Brain Disease

Posted: 05 Nov 2009 11:00 AM PST

ald-genetherapy

Scientists have used gene therapy to halt the progression of adrenoleukodystrophy, a fatal neurodegenerative disease caused by a single defective gene, in two seven-year-old boys.

It took more than a decade to refine the therapy, in which stem cells taken from the boys' bone marrow were hacked with healthy copies of the gene, then returned to their bodies. Without them, the boys would soon be dead.

"They would now be unable to speak, to walk, to communicate, to sit, to eat. They would be in an advanced stage of the disease, in a vegetative state," said Patrick Aubourg, a pediatric neurologist at France's National Institute for Health and Medical Research who led the treatment's development. "Instead they go to school. They live a normal life."

The gene at the root of adrenoleukodystropy — ALD for short — is called ABCD1, and produces a protein necessary to maintain myelin, a compound that acts as an insulator for nerve fibers in the brain and peripheral nervous system. As myelin degrades, the fibers cannot conduct electrical impulses.

The boys who received the treatment suffered from the early form of ALD, in which the defective gene is found only on the X chromosome. His story is described in a paper published Thursday in Science. Technically known as X-linked ALD, it affects boys, typically starting in childhood and killing them in two to three years. It can be treated with bone marrow transplants, but success rates are low, and toxic immune system-suppressing drugs are needed to prevent patients' bodies from rejecting foreign tissue — if, that is, a donor can even be found.

No such donor was found for the children, who had just a six-month window after diagnosis in which treatment could be started. After that, it would have been too late. So their parents turned to Aubourg's therapy, which had only been tried in laboratory animals.

One of the children — their identities remain confidential — received the treatment two and a half years ago. The other received it three years ago. In both, the disease has stopped progressing. Their brains scans show myelin damage that has stopped, and their new genes are active as ever.

The results are as striking as any previously delivered by gene therapy, a biotechnological technique that after nearly two decades of anticipation has largely failed to deliver on its lab-bench promise — though that may be changing.

"There is reason to think that this will last for the rest of their lives," said gene therapist Nathalie Cartier of NIHMR, the study's lead author.

In 1993, when Aubourg discovered how to duplicate the ABCD1 gene in a laboratory, he envisioned adding it to blood stem cells, which give rise to the different types of blood cells — including, critically, the cells that make myelin. Every new cell would produce the correct protein. The ALD would disappear.

This type of approach is one example of gene therapy, a technique that even now is highly experimental, and was more experimental then. The first "vector" used by Aubourg — a virus engineered to carry new genes into target cells — succeeded in delivering its payload just .001 percent of the time. Even this miniscule success rate was enough to improve symptoms in mouse models of ALD, but he didn't trust it to work in people.

Aubourg went back to the drawing board. He used a new vector made from a human immunodeficiency virus from which the genome had been removed, leaving only HIV's cell-penetrating shell. Inside this he put the new ABCD1 gene, and a string of DNA that helps it fuse with target chromosomes.

The new vector, called a lentivirus, didn't work all the time, but it was far more efficient than the old one. In the two boys who received the treatment, 15 percent of the stem cells in their bone marrow now possess a copy of the healthy ABCD1 gene. These cells are essentially immortal, and should provide a steady supply of healthy myelin-producing cells in perpetuity.

"Even this low-end number is high enough," said Aurora Pujol, an ALD researcher at Spain's IDIBELL Research Institute. She knew the two boys when they were patients at a hospital in Spain, waiting in vain for bone marrow transplants, and connected them to Aubourg's laboratory. "They did a great job."

The boys did not escape unscathed, and still suffer from some cognitive difficulties. And though no side effects have been observed, far more testing is needed to be certain that the treatment is safe. "The risk is never zero," said Auborg.

Indeed, gene therapy is still best-known for its high-profile failures. In 1999, 18-year-old Jesse Gelsinger died during tests of a gene therapy for a rare metabolic disorder. In 2003, two French children receiving treatment for severe immune deficiencies developed leukemia.

But with the recent success of a gene therapy for blindness, and the refinement of new, apparently more reliable methods, gene therapy may have turned a corner.

"This is an important step forward for ALD, but not only for ALD," said Pujol. "The lentiviral vector approach can be applied to other single-gene diseases."

Jeffrey Rothstein, a Johns Hopkins gene therapist who specializes in Lou Gehrig's disease, warned against extrapolating too much from the early ALD results. "It's great that it worked, but that doesn't guarantee success in other diseases," he said.

But University of Pennsylvania bioethicist Art Caplan, who has followed gene therapy since its beginning, shared some of Pujol's excitement.

"I think this is the beginning of a turnaround," he said. "It took a long time to move from animal research to clinical success. It took more than a decade to get anywhere. But these breakthroughs show that this long-touted technology is about to produce clinical benefits."

Image: Over the course of two years, the breakdown of myelin in a boy with ALD who did not receive the therapy (above) and one who did, from Science.

See Also:

Citation: "Hematopoietic Stem Cell Gene Therapy with a Lentiviral Vector in X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy." By Nathalie Cartier, Salima Hacein-Bey-Abina, Cynthia C. Bartholomae, Gabor Veres, Manfred Schmidt, Ina Kutschera, Michel Vidaud, Ulrich Abel, Liliane Dal-Cortivo, Laure Caccavelli, Nizar Mahlaoui, Véronique Kiermer, Denice Mittelstaedt, Céline Bellesme, Najiba Lahlou, François Lefrère, Stéphane Blanche, Muriel Audit, Emmanuel Payen, Philippe Leboulch, Bruno l'Homme, Pierre Bougnères, Christof Von Kalle, Alain Fischer, Marina Cavazzana-Calvo, Patrick Aubourg. Science, Vol. 326 No. 5954, November 5, 2009.

Brandon Keim's Twitter stream and reportorial outtakes; Wired Science on Twitter. Brandon is currently working on a book about ecosystem and planetary tipping points.

Thursday, 5 November 2009

Johnald's Fantastical Daily Link Splurge

Johnald's Fantastical Daily Link Splurge


Hubble’s New Camera Delivers Another Stunner

Posted: 05 Nov 2009 09:05 AM PST

hubblem83close

The Hubble Space Telescope's new camera is returning incredibly detailed, stunning images of space. This close-up view of an area near the core of the iconic Southern Pinwheel galaxy, or M83, shows very rapid star birth.

pinwheelm83The image to the right of the entire galaxy, taken from the ground by the European Southern Observatory's 2.2-meter telescope at La Silla, Chile, shows the location of the image above. Hubble's detailed view reveals that the spiral arms of the galaxy, about 15 million light-years from Earth, are lousy with clusters of infant stars, only a few million years old. The clusters show up as red because of the hydrogen gas they emit, and they have blown holes in the brownish dust tracks of the arms.

The image also reveals around 60 supernova remnants, around five times more than had previously been seen. the different wavelengths of light captured by Hubble's camera, from ultraviolet to near-infrared, gives scientists a look at stars in all stages of formation, which will help them understand the evolution of the Pinwheel galaxy, and give them insight into galaxy formation in general.

Images: 1) NASA, ESA, STScI/AURA. High-Def Version. 2) ESO.

See Also:

Follow us on Twitter @betsymason and @wiredscience, and on Facebook.

This Is Your Brain, on Sofa

Posted: 04 Nov 2009 02:22 PM PST

brain_wave_sofa1

It's either the ultimate in couch comfort or a totally bizarre idea dreamed up by a pair of designers obsessed with neuroscience. Either way, the "Brainwave Sofa" is clearly a one-of-a-kind piece of furniture.

The couch's lumpy, bumpy shape is a three-dimensional version of a brain scan, specifically a three-second recording of designer Lucas Maassen's alpha brain waves as he closed his eyes and thought of the word "comfort." Data from the electroencephalograph was processed by BioExplorer, a 3-D visualization program, and then fed directly into a milling machine that cut the shape out of soft foam.bwmilling

"The process is a wink to a rather futuristic design process," the couch creators wrote in a press release, "for which a designer merely has to close his or her eyes, or merely rest, to have the brain do all the work, and create the data needed to have the CNC machine cut the shape of the sofa."

The x-axis of the couch represents Maassen's brain waves in hertz, while the y-axis shows the amount of alpha activity as a percentage, and the z-axis is the time in milliseconds. Once the foam core of the sofa was completed, the designers covered it by hand in soft gray felt and decorated the valleys of the brain waves with buttons.

The Brainwave Sofa goes on display Wednesday at the Bits 'n Pieces Exhibition in New York. If you happen to stop by the show, please have a seat on the brain couch — and let us know if it's comfy. Or just weird.

bwmakingof

Images: Lucas Maassen and Dries Verbruggen/Unfold.

See Also:

Follow us on Twitter @wiredscience, and on Facebook.

Gadgets and Ideas to Revolutionize Healthcare

Posted: 04 Nov 2009 11:44 AM PST

venter

The TED medicine conference gave 400 people a glimpse at the future of healthcare last week, bringing together an eclectic group of innovators, from photographers to stem cell experts, each with a different point to make.

Here are some of the highlights.

Craig Venter said he has spent the last twenty years digitizing biology. Now, the genomics pioneer is doing something with all of that data. His lab has been transplanting entire genomes from one microorganism to another, building synthetic life forms with machines, and decoding a random soup of genes from seawater using high speed sequencing machines.

Venter made a convincing argument that those DNA sequences discovered during his voyages will be put to good use. Aquatic microbes are constantly waging chemical warfare with each other, and 10,000 antibiotics remain to be discovered in the seas, he said. By studying the genes from those combative organisms, researchers could develop a wide range of new medications.

Synthetic life itself could be used as a medication, according to Andrew Hessel, founder of the Pink Army Cooperative, a group that aims to fight breast cancer with customized cancer-killing viruses. His organization aims to turn medical research on its head by offering individualized treatments through a member-owned organization, rather than supporting the development of one-size-fits-all drugs, which are peddled by big drug companies. Hessel aims to conduct human trials on an open-minded breast cancer patient who has no attractive medical alternatives, after testing sets of the cancer-destroying viruses on cells taken from her own tumor.

Image Above: Craig Venter talking about genomics and synthetic biology./Michael Timmons.

Wednesday, 4 November 2009

Johnald's Fantastical Daily Link Splurge

Johnald's Fantastical Daily Link Splurge


Early Life Hedged Its Bets to Survive

Posted: 04 Nov 2009 10:00 AM PST

press_colonies_beaumont

By forcing bacteria to evolve in ever-changing conditions, scientists have induced a behavior in which colonies formed by microbes with identical genes take radically different forms, as if one sibling in a pair of identical quadruplets could sprout gills.

Technically known as "stochastic switching between phenotypic states" — or, more conversationally, hedging your bets — the ability may have been critical to the success of primitive forms of life.

Bet hedging "may have been among the earliest evolutionary solutions to life in variable environments," even preceding the ability to turn genes on and off, wrote researchers in a study published Wednesday in Nature.

Scientists have known for decades about bet hedging, which is widespread in the natural world. One well-known example comes from disease-causing bacteria, which randomly produce different surface proteins, a few of which are bound to escape immune system detection. For all its ubiquity, however, bet-hedging behavior was at first considered counter-intuitive, even baffling. After all, in any given instance, it's better to have the right surface protein.

But it's not always possible to know what's right in advance, especially in highly variable environments. In the 1960s, evolutionary biologists made mathematical models suggesting that bet hedging made sense over the long run. Some researchers even speculated that it was a basic component in the toolbox of early life, allowing primitive microbes to adapt rapidly, without being able to sense their environments or adjust gene activity — a sophisticated ability that probably took hundreds of millions of years to emerge.

But for all this theorizing, the evolution of bet-hedging had until now never been directly observed.

"Almost every biologist knows about this and is fascinated by it," said study co-author Hubertus Beaumont, a Leiden University biologist. "We go one step further, and see this evolving in real time."

Beaumont started the experiment with a population of genetically identical Pseudomonas fluorescens, a common bacterium that divides every 45 minutes and has a relatively small genome, making it easy to study.

From that strain, they seeded 12 different bacterial lines, each growing in a tube of undisturbed, nutrient-rich broth. After three days, a sample was taken and spread on agar plates to see what type of colonies formed. The bacteria divided and spread across each plate. The researchers then took a single sample of the healthiest colony and transferred it to a tube of shaken broth. After another three days of growth, the P. fluorescens in that tube were again sampled, spread on agar, and the healthiest put back into unshaken broth.

From a human perspective, it was as if tribes that thrived in a forest were suddenly tossed in a desert, then thrown back as soon as they'd started to adjust. The switch was performed a total of 16 times, with the researchers sequencing the survivors' genomes at each step.

Earlier research by Paul Rainey, a Massey University evolutionary geneticist and co-author of the study, showed that different types of broth drove the evolution of different colony types. Shaken broth favored colonies that, in their aggregates of millions of microbes, had a smooth, rounded appearance. Unshaken conditions favored the evolution of wrinkled, fast-spreading colonies. As the rounds of selection continued, some P. fluorescens lines evolved back and forth between wrinkly and smooth types.

But in two of the lines, something special happened: In the very same tube, sharing the very same genetic inheritance, were cells that formed completely different types of colonies. Some were wrinkled, and others were smooth. It was as if those P. fluorescens strains had planned for an unpredictable future.

When the researchers looked at the genomic histories, they found that bet hedging required nine genetic mutations. The first eight were linked to traits that helped microbes survive in shaken and static tubes. The ninth, involving a gene important in metabolism, triggered the ability to produce multiple colony forms. The researchers ran the experiment multiple times, with similar results. An average of one line in twelve would evolve bet hedging, always as a result of the same accumulation of mutations.

This ability "could reasonably—one might think—take tens of thousands of generations to evolve," wrote the researchers. Instead, it took a few months. That it emerged so rapidly hints at the role it may have played for microbes that hadn't yet evolved ability to to sense changes in temperature or nutrient availability, much less respond to them.

"For them, the world was completely unpredictable," said Beaumont. "I suspect that if you go back in time, you'd find organisms with one genotype that could express a wide range of strategies."

Richard Lenski, a Michigan State University evolutionary biologist known for his decades-long studies of evolutionary dynamics in E. coli colonies, said that it's difficult to know exactly what happened early in life's history. "But their results do show that such adaptations evolve pretty easily, so it's certainly possible," said Lenski, who was not involved in the study.

As for what caused colonies to take radically different forms from their genetically identical neighbors, or why that ninth mutation in particular was so critical, Beaumont doesn't yet know. Although we know the mutations, the details of the mechanisms underlying evolution, even in simple bacteria, are often "still hidden in a black box," he said.

"We want to know what's going on in that box," said Beaumont. "We're going beyond theory. We're doing experiments with evolution itself."

Image: Hubertus Beaumont

See Also:

Citation: "Experimental evolution of bet hedging." Hubertus J. E. Beaumont, Jenna Gallie, Christian Kost, Gayle C. Ferguson & Paul B. Rainey. Nature, Vol. 461 No. 7269, November 4, 2009.

Brandon Keim's Twitter stream and reportorial outtakes; Wired Science on Twitter. Brandon is currently working on a book about ecosystem and planetary tipping points.

Baby Neutron Star Found Inside Supernova Remnant

Posted: 04 Nov 2009 10:00 AM PST

heinkevisual

Scientists have finally identified the mysterious source of X-ray emissions at the center of our galaxy's youngest supernova: Inside the remains of Cassiopeia A sits a baby neutron star surrounded by a thin layer of carbon dioxide.

Twenty times heavier than our sun and 11,000 light years away from Earth, Cassiopeia A was a dense star that exploded roughly 330 years ago. The supernova left behind a dense central core 12.5 miles wide that was first spotted in 1999 by NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory. But until now, astronomers hadn't come up with a model to explain the object's confusing X-ray emission spectrum. Previous attempts had come up with a stellar radius too small to be a neutron star, or a non-uniform surface temperature, which didn't make sense.

main-imageNow, combining data from two prior studies, researchers have discovered that Cassiopeia's X-ray emission pattern can be explained by the presence of a very young neutron star with a low magnetic field and an unusually thin carbon dioxide atmosphere.

Published Wednesday in Nature, the findings make Cassiopeia's core the youngest neutron star scientists have ever encountered.

"This discovery helps us understand how neutron stars are born in violent supernova explosions," astrophysicist Craig Heinke of the University of Alberta said in a press release. "This neutron star was born so hot that nuclear fusion happened on its surface, producing a carbon atmosphere just 10 centimeters thick."

Images: 1) A Chandra X-ray Observatory image of the supernova remnant Cassiopeia A, NASA/CXC/Southampton/W.Ho. 2) A close-up of the same image, with an artist's rendering of the neutron star at the center of the remnant, NASA/CXC/M.Weiss.

See Also:

Spider’s Color-Changing Camouflage Is a Mystery

Posted: 04 Nov 2009 06:25 AM PST

crabspider1

Crab spiders can scuttle, but apparently they can't hide.

sciencenewsLong touted as an example of cryptic coloring, the female Misumena vatiaspider switches her body color over the course of days depending on the flower where she lurks. Contrary to the textbook scenario, though, a white spider on a white flower doesn't catch more prey than a white spider moved to a yellow flower, researchers report online November 3 in Proceedings of the Royal Society B

Nor does a yellow spider on a yellow flower get a color-coordination bonus, says study coauthor Rolf Brechbühl of the University of Fribourg in Switzerland. He and his colleagues reached this conclusion after videotaping some 2,000 occasions when an insect buzzed over to a flower that held a spider. Sitting on a bloom ready to pounce on pollinators, the spider supposedly shifts to match her background by switching between white and yellow. To human eyes, she looks as if she's becoming harder for her prey to see.

The study "finally shatters the myth of crypsis by color matching in crab spiders," comments behavioral ecologist Marie Herberstein of Macquarie University in Sydney, who was not part of the study. "I suspect that textbooks may now need to be rewritten."

crabspider2Color changing probably has some adaptive benefit for the spiders, according to ecologist Thomas C. Ings of Queen Mary University of London. What those benefits might be still isn't clear, he says, "but this paper is exciting, as it shows that we may be focusing our attention in the wrong direction."

Another possible direction — protection from the spider's own predators — also doesn't look encouraging in the new study. Brechbühl says that his research focused on spider prey, but he points out that all this videotaping took place in a field with plenty of birds and other possible menaces around. Even though he frequently moved spiders to flowers of the wrong color, he recorded only one predator (a bird) nabbing a spider.

Ideas about crab spider coloration have been unraveling since 2001 when Lars Chittka, also of Queen Mary, pointed out that bees see ultraviolet wavelengths but that non–UV-reflecting spiders often sit on UV-reflecting flowers.

To test for an effect of color on M. vatia crab spiders' hunting, Brechbühl and his colleagues set up clusters of yellow, white and violet wildflowers in a field. The researchers filmed each spider for three days, tallying all potential prey. Spiders caught only 3.5 percent of insect visitors, and in terms of volume of insect meat, color-coordination didn't make a difference to the catch.

Musing about other possible benefits of color changing, Ings notes that only adult females change color. "So is there a specific advantage to crypsis in mature females about to lay eggs?" he says. Or perhaps the color change worked against other predators or prey in the past and has not been lost.

Images: 1) Flickr/jomike. 2) Flickr/ClifB.

See Also:

Darwin’s Wolf Mystery Solved

Posted: 03 Nov 2009 11:24 AM PST

falkland_wolf

Genetic analysis of the now-extinct Falkland Islands Wolf has answered a biological riddle that caught the attention of a young Charles Darwin, and helped shape his understanding of evolution.

During his voyage aboard the HMS Beagle, Darwin observed that the wolves — like his now-famous finches — varied widely in size between different islands, suggesting that the traits of species were not immutable, but changed over time in response to their environments.

Darwin also wondered at the origins of the wolves, which were unusually small, and had reddish fur and relatively short jaws. He dubbed them foxes, and was the first of many scientists to suspect that the strange canids weren't wolves at all. Others thought they were descended from dogs brought by the islands' first human settlers. Indeed, not a single mammal species other than the wolf was native to the Falkland Islands, located 300 miles off the southeastern tip of South America.

In a study published Tuesday in Current Biology, researchers address these questions with a genetic analysis of five museum specimens. Their findings are twofold. First, the specimens last shared a common ancestor 70,000 years ago, or a full 50,000 years before humans sailed to the Falklands; and the animals' closest relative is the maned wolf, still found on the savannas of South America.

Moreover, the split from the maned wolf appears to have occurred 6.7 million years ago — some four million years before wolves are known to have lived in South America. At that time, maned wolves lived in North America, and it seems that all of South America's canids originated in the north.

Unfortunately, by the time Darwin arrived in the Falklands, the wolves were being killed for their fur, and their numbers were in decline. "Within a very few years after these islands shall have become regularly settled, in all probability this fox will be classed with the dodo, as an animal which has perished from the face of the earth," he wrote.

Forty years later, the Falklands Islands wolf was gone.

Image: From Zoology of the Voyage of the H.M.S. Beagle

See Also:

Citation: "Evolutionary history of the Falklands wolf." By Graham J. Slater, Olaf Thalmann, Jennifer A. Leonard, Rena M. Schweizer, Klaus-Peter Koepfl, John P. Pollinger, Nicolas J. Rawlence, Jeremy J. Austin, Alan Cooper, and Robert K. Wayne. Current Biology, Vol. 19 Issue 20, November 3, 2009.

Brandon Keim's Twitter stream and reportorial outtakes; Wired Science on Twitter. Brandon is currently working on a book about ecosystem and planetary tipping points.

Tuesday, 3 November 2009

Johnald's Fantastical Daily Link Splurge

Johnald's Fantastical Daily Link Splurge


Russia Leads Nuclear Space Race After U.S. Drops Out

Posted: 03 Nov 2009 09:27 AM PST

gpn-2002-0001431

The Russian space agency may build a nuclear-powered spacecraft with the blessing of the country's leader, Russian and international media reported Thursday.

The craft would cost $600 million and Russian scientists claim it could be ready as early as 2012.

"The idea (of nuclear-powered spaceflight) has bright prospects, and if Russia could stage a breakthrough it could become our main contribution to any future international program of deep space exploration," Andrei Ionin, an independent Moscow-based space expert, told Christian Science Monitor.

Building a nuclear-powered spacecraft is feasible, said Patrick McDaniel, a nuclear engineer and co-director of the University of New Mexico's Institute for Space and Nuclear Power Studies, but probably not in the short time frame that the Russians have proposed.

"To have a test article that they could test on the ground, that's very reasonable," McDaniel said, "To have a completed system, that's highly unlikely."

If the spaceship actually gets built, it would complete a half-century long quest to bring nuclear power to space propulsion beginning with a 1947 report by North American Aviation to the Air Force.

It's not hard to see why engineers would want to use nuclear power. Fission reactors provide a lot of power for their size, which is a key attribute in designing space systems. One engineer claims nuclear rockets are inherently twice as efficient as their chemical brethren. Their attributes could have increased the exploration range of the space program, nuclear propulsion advocates argue, allowing us to get to more interesting places.

"We could have done a lot more things in space. We could have gone more places," McDaniel said of nuclear rocket research. "It's highly likely we would have gone to Mars."

The current plans to potentially return to Mars do not include a nuclear rocket, but several decades of plans from the 1950s through the 1980s just assumed that nuclear power would be a part of the effort to reach the Red Planet.

Towards that end, the Air Force, which preceded NASA in managing space programs, created Project Rover in conjunction with Los Alamos National Laboratory.

The goal of Rover was to develop a reactor that could be used for propulsion. Various incarnations of the reactor the scientists developed, called Kiwi, were tested at Jackass Flats, Nevada (see video). The idea behind the reactor was to use the heat generated by fission to heat hydrogen, which would expand, generating the force to push the rocket.

None of the reactors ran for more than eight minutes, but they were considered to have met their goals. Technically, they worked.


Though the exhaust from the rockets is radioactive, the first serious program to build a nuclear-powered rocket, Project Rover, enjoyed broad government support, even after it hit some cost overrun problems in the early 1960s.

"Everyone likes Rover — the White House, the Atomic Energy Commission, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration," TIME magazine wrote in 1962. "Senator [Clinton] Anderson insists that nuclear-powered rocketry is as important to U.S. security as the hydrogen bomb."

Beginning in July 1958, with the creation of NASA, work on nuclear rockets became the provenance of the Space Nuclear Propulsion Office. They began to consolidate the various programs, creating the Nuclear Engine for Rocket Vehicle Application program.

Further reactor and nuclear rocket development occurred under NERVA. Several other reactors and rocket designs were tested, most successfully the Phoebus and XE-Prime. There were test failures, but the programs, overall, are considered technical successes.

Beyond the nuclear rocket designs, the United States also launched a small nuclear reactor, SNAP10a, into space that generated electricity. It orbited for 43 days before a non-reactor-related technical failure shut it down. (See the video for an animated explanation of the project.)

Later, the concept was largely abandoned just because no one really knew what to do with a nuclear reactor in space.

"Snap 10A was a technology demo, the question was then, well, what do we want to do with it?" McDaniel said. "And no one had a really good answer."

Other, more fanciful nuclear propulsion ideas were proposed, too. One, Project Orion, would have been powered by nuclear bombs. The physicist Freeman Dyson, who worked on the project, told The New York Times Magazine he saw it "as the solution to a problem. With one trip we'd have got rid of 2,000 bombs."

"Orion was a delightful scientific exercise, but not very feasible," McDaniel said.

These various technologies cost money to develop, of course, and the scale of the cash that flowed their way shows how seriously Americans took nuclear propulsion. Between 1955 and 1972, the United States spent more than $1.4 billion in then-year dollars on developing nuclear rockets and related technologies. At the end of that period, when the Nixon administration cut NASA's budget generally and NERVA's specifically, the United States was well on its way to developing nuclear power for spacefaring and space purposes.

"It is indeed remarkable that the adoption of the Rover–NERVA database, upgraded and modernized by current rocket-engine technology, would fully satisfy NASA's space transfer propulsion and long-distance exploration requirements and permit realization of a safe and low programmatic risk development programme," wrote Stanley Gunn, who worked on the nuclear propulsion program for Rocketdyne, in a 2001 article for Space Policy.

There were several attempts to resurrect nuclear propulsion of various types, most recently the mothballed Project Prometheus. None, though, have garnered much support. One major reason is that NASA picks its propulsion systems based on its targets — and true exploration of the solar system and beyond hasn't really been a serious goal, the Constellation plans for a return to the moon aside.

"The destinations dictate the power system," said Rao Surampudi, a Jet Propulsion Laboratory engineer who works on the development of power systems.

By and large, it's cheaper and easier to go with solar power or very low-power radioisotope generators like the one that powers the Cassini mission.

McDaniel agreed that the targets drive things, citing the general decline of pure technology development research at NASA.

"Until we commit to going back to Mars, we're not going to have a nuclear rocket," McDaniel said.

Or perhaps a new nuclear-powered Russian spacecraft could get anxious minds at the Pentagon and NASA worrying about the need to keep pace with the Ivanovs.

After all, the Soviet nuclear rocket program may have been more advanced than the American efforts at the time of the USSR's collapse.

92550781

Images: 1) A NERVA test engine going to the testing spot./NASA. 2) A proposed nuclear rocket to Mars rendering./NASA.

See Also:

WiSci 2.0: Alexis Madrigal's Twitter, Google Reader feed, and green tech history research site; Wired Science on Twitter and Facebook.

Space Junk Could Be Tracked Like Vultures

Posted: 03 Nov 2009 08:39 AM PST

orbitaldebris

Dangerous debris near rocket launches could be tracked in real time by combining tricks from particle colliders, moon landings and vulture tracking, a new study finds.

sciencenewsIn a paper to be published in Acta Astronautica, physicist Philip Metzger of NASA's Kennedy Space Center and colleagues describe a technique to plot the paths and determine the densities of worrisome detritus kicked up during launch. This method could help flight engineers know instantly which pieces of debris threaten the spacecraft.

"We combined together two different types of software that can do on-site analysis," Metzger says. "In the future we can take video of the launch environment, and the software can automatically … conclude what were the sources and the makeup of the debris." The paper was published online at arXiv.org on October 22.

"For manned missions, this is very important. I'm surprised it's not been done yet," comments Nilton Renno of the University of Michigan, who studies how rocket plumes from Mars landers affect the Martian surface. "It will improve our confidence in the assessment of potential damage, not just for the space shuttle but for any other future spacecraft."

shuttleatlantisIn 2003, the Space Shuttle Columbia was damaged by a dislodged piece of insulation. The damage caused the shuttle to break apart upon reentry, killing all seven astronauts on board. The event showed how crucial it is to catch debris damage early.

The need for better tracking systems during launch was highlighted during the Space Shuttle Discovery launch in May 2008, when several thousand bricks blew out the end of the flame trench under the shuttle. Simultaneously, a mysterious piece of debris flew high into the air near the shuttle, apparently from the flame trench. Had the mystery object been a brick, it could have damaged the shuttle and put the crew at risk.

To identify the object, Metzger and colleagues took advantage of NASA's bird watching system. In 2005, during the first launch after the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster, a shuttle was threatened by another flying menace: a vulture that smacked into the external tank during takeoff.

Since then, engineers have tracked vultures as a routine part of launch by taking pictures of the launch area from two different angles. Combining the pictures gives a three-dimensional view of the region, so moving objects like birds and bricks can be found and followed. Metzger and colleagues have used similar measures to model how a rocket plume could scatter dust and boulders in the low-gravity environment of the moon, threatening nearby lunar outposts.

For the May 2008 Discovery launch, Metzger's team used images from the vulture-tracking system to plot the mystery object's trajectory, then did some simple ballistics analysis to figure out the object's density. Neither technique is complicated or new, but the combination of images and ballistics had never been used for launch analyses before.

"We're not the first people to study this by a long shot," Metzger says. "All we've done is developed a new technique that seems to be very useful and very fast."

The object was too light to be a brick, but it was the same density as a piece of foam from a solid rocket booster. "At no point was the orbiter in any danger" from the foam, says Bob Carilli a coauthor of the study and engineer with NASA contractor United Space Alliance.

Now that they've shown that the method works, Metzger and colleagues hope to speed the system up with tricks from particle colliders. Particle colliders automatically flag collisions that look interesting and store data for further inspection. NASA could use similar techniques to target only the potentially dangerous launch debris.

"The objective is not to study the individual particles that result from the collision, but rather to burrow down into the originating event," Metzger says. "That's our ultimate objective too."

The system will be used on the next launch. "We're using it right away. We'll use it routinely from now on, whenever we analyze debris," Metzger says. "Now that the software's been written and debugged, it only takes a couple hours to do the whole process, which is a big improvement."

Images: NASA

See Also:

How to Keep Planes From Colliding With Lasers

Posted: 03 Nov 2009 06:48 AM PST

laser

Beaming high-powered lasers into the sky allows scientists to study changing weather patterns, pollution in the Earth's atmosphere and even gravity on the Moon. But if one of those helpful lasers happens to cross paths with an airplane, it can temporarily blind or distract the pilot and potentially cause a crash.

The current method to avoid plane-laser collisions is decidedly low-tech: Federal Aviation Administration regulations require anyone who's sending a laser up into the atmosphere to employ multiple human observers, called "spotters," to watch for planes flying within 25 degrees of the laser beam. Now, researchers have created a radio-tracking device that can perform the same task as a pair of eyes, without the potential for human error.

"The two-spotter system is a problem because spotters can forget to set their alarm clocks, they can get sick, they can get confused about the schedule, and then suddenly you don't have two spotters anymore and you can't operate your program," said physicist Tom Murphy of the University of California, San Diego, who is co-leading the radio detection project.

In addition, Murphy says spending all night watching the sky for airplanes can be a cold and windy experience. "I think we have concerns, and the FAA certainly has concerns, about the attention and the wherewithal of spotters," he said. "An automated system would be vigilant, wouldn't get tired, and as long as you have checks that it's working as you expect, would be highly reliable."

The new plane-spotting device takes advantage of air traffic control systems carried by nearly all types of aircraft. Using two radio antennae with different beam widths, researchers can track the constant radio emissions from these systems and figure out when a plane is getting too close for comfort.

"The FAA suggests that an angle of about 15 degrees is about where you better start worrying," said engineer Bill Coles, who co-designed the radio system. But because the strength of a radio signal drops off quickly with distance, the device can't judge how close a plane is getting based on the power of a single radio signal. Instead, the researchers compare signals from two antennae, one with a beam width of 15 degrees and one with a much wider beam width.

"We point both antennas in the direction of the laser beam, and then we check the relative power," Coles said. "If the power in the narrow beam antenna is greater than the power in the broad-beam antenna, we know it must be within 15 degrees of the beam — that works no matter how far away the aircraft is because it's a ratio of the powers."

So far, the researchers have tested a prototype of the device on two laser telescopes, one at Apache Point Observatory in New Mexico and the other at the Palomar Observatory in San Diego. After collecting nearly a year's worth of data at Apache Point, the group posted their results on the open-access repository arXiv.org.

"Any time the telescope is open, whether or not the laser is on, we're collecting loads and loads of information on what the system sees," Murphy said. So far, they've compared the radio system to observations made by human spotters — and every plane identified by human eyes has also been detected by the radio device.

Eventually, the researchers hope to get the device sanctioned by the FAA as an alternative or addition to human spotters. First, however, they want to cross-check their data with records kept by the FAA, to make sure they're not missing any airplanes, including those that might have been overlooked by human eyes.

Detecting every at-risk plane is important because, like any powerful laser pointed in the wrong direction, research lasers can cause temporary or permanent damage if flashed into the eyes. According to an FAQ page on the FAA site, "the temporary adverse visual effects may include distraction, startle, glare, flashblindness, and/or afterimage." And during critical tasks like take-off and landing, the FAA says even a brief flash of laser light can be enough to cause an accident.

Indeed, more than a thousand incidents involving lasers and airplanes have been documented since 2004. Most of the recent incidents have involved laser pointers directed either intentionally or unintentionally at aircraft during takeoff and landing — for example, one malcontent with a laser pointer targeted 12 planes trying to land at a Seattle airport in February.

Although the researchers said they don't know of any airplane accidents specifically caused by research lasers, the near-constant use of these powerful instruments makes safety a prime concern.

"Sending lasers through the atmosphere is probably happening somewhere in the world," Murphy said, "at any given time."

Via Technology Review

Image: A telescope at NASA Goddard sends a green laser up to the moon to track lunar spacecraft, Tom Zagwodzki/Goddard Space Flight Center.

See Also:

Follow us on Twitter @wiredscience, and on Facebook.

Gamma-Ray Mystery Traced to Star-Birth Frenzy

Posted: 02 Nov 2009 11:55 AM PST

8x10.ai

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Astronomers have for the first time traced gamma rays, the most energetic form of light, to galaxies undergoing a frenzy of star birth. The finding, which has revealed a new class of galactic gamma-ray sources, is not unexpected. But it provides new hints about the origin of many cosmic rays, the high-speed protons and other charged particles of extraordinarily high energies that bombard Earth.

sciencenewsAccording to the prevailing theory, cosmic rays are accelerated to energies of billions to trillions of electron volts by the expanding shock waves generated when massive stars explode as supernovas. (Cosmic rays with even higher energies are thought to be powered by supermassive black holes at the centers of galaxies.) Kinks in a galaxy's magnetic field keep the particles, mainly protons and other charged particles, bouncing back and forth like ping-pong balls between the advancing shock wave and the region just in front of it, revving up the particles to these high energies, the model suggests.

Massive stars live for only a few million years before exploding — an eyeblink in astronomical terms. Galaxies that produce lots of newborn stars therefore have lots of dying stars that explode as supernovas and ought to have an abundance of cosmic rays.

Testing the theory that supernova shock waves generate cosmic rays hasn't been easy, however, because galactic magnetic fields bend the direction of travel of all charged particles, including cosmic rays, preventing astronomers from tracing any but the highest energy particles — which can escape the magnetic fields — back to their home galaxies.

But when cosmic rays collide with other atomic nuclei in surrounding gas or dust, they produce gamma rays, the most energetic form of light. And unlike charged particles, light can't be bent by magnetic fields.

mb2veritasA new generation of gamma-ray telescopes, including the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope launched in 2008, and VERITAS, an array of four 12-meter telescopes atop Mount Hopkins in Arizona, has now succeeded in detecting gamma rays from three galaxies undergoing intense waves of starbirth. The finding helps to confirm the connection between supernovas and cosmic rays.

Researchers reported the findings November 2 at the 2009 Fermi Symposium (named for the Fermi Gamma-ray telescope, the main focus of the conference). VERITAS observed gamma rays ranging from 700 billion eV to several trillion eV from the galaxy M82, which is some 12 million light-years from Earth. M82 is classified as a starburst galaxy because within a small, central region it makes stars at a rate 10 times higher than that of the entire Milky Way.

Although M82 is one of the closest starburst galaxies, "it took us two years of all-out observations of M82 to acquire all the necessary data," said VERITAS researcher Wystan Benbowof the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory in Cambridge, Mass. Starburst galaxies produce a diffuse gamma-ray glow that is about one-millionth the brightness of galaxies that have active, supermassive black holes at their centers — the only type of galaxy from which gamma-ray telescopes had previously recorded emissions.

Finding gamma rays in a starburst galaxy "had been long predicted, but nobody had ever done it before this year," noted Benbow, whose team also reported the discovery online November 1 in Nature.

The Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, which records lower-energy gamma rays than does VERITAS, also found gammas from M82 and from another starburst galaxy, NGC 253, reported Keith Bechtolof the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory in Menlo Park, Calif. In addition, Fermi recorded a diffuse gamma-ray glow from a region of intense star formation in the Large Magellanic Cloud, a small satellite galaxy of the Milky Way, said Jürgen Knödlseder of the Center for the Study of Space Radiation in Toulouse, France.

The Large Magellanic Cloud is close enough to the Milky Way that Knödlseder and his colleagues could tell that the gamma rays emanated from a region that has highly ionized gas. Such sites are places where massive stars, which produce ionizing radiation, are expected to be common. The finding "implies that massive star-forming regions are the main source of cosmic rays in the Large Magellanic Cloud," Knödlseder said.

Bechtol noted that the two starburst galaxies, M82 and NGC 253, have a higher rate of supernova production and emit more gamma rays than the Large Magellanic Cloud, another clue that supernovas and cosmic rays are intrinsically linked.

After hearing the news, "I didn't fall out of my chair but I got a big smile on my face," says theorist Brian Fields of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, who is not a member of either discovery team. Had Fermi and VERITAS not found gamma-ray emissions from starburst galaxies, he notes, "it would have been back to the drawing board" for understanding the origin of cosmic rays.

Although the discoveries "bolster our confidence that cosmic rays are accelerated by supernova remnants," they do not clinch the case, said gamma-ray theorist Charles Dermer of the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, D.C., a member of the Fermi collaboration.

The clincher may come, he says, if an ongoing analysis of Fermi data finds that gamma-ray emissions from starburst galaxies peak at an energy of 70 million eV. That corresponds to the energy generated when a subatomic particle called a neutral pion decays into two gamma rays. Because galactic pions can only be generated by cosmic-ray collisions, finding this peak would provide compelling proof for the theory, Dermer said.

veritas

Images: 1) M82 / NASA, ESA, CXC, and JPL-Caltech. 2) Gamma-ray emissions coming from M82 / CfA/V.A. Acciari. 3) Steve Criswell, SAO.

See Also:

Oldest Preserved Spider Web Dates Back to Dinosaurs

Posted: 02 Nov 2009 11:22 AM PST

spider_in_amber-copy

The world's oldest known spider web has been discovered on a beach in Sussex, England, trapped inside an ancient chunk of amber.

Scientists found the rare amber fossil in December, and have now confirmed that it contains remnants of spider silk spun roughly 140 million years ago by an ancestor of modern orb-weaving spiders. After slicing the amber into thin sections and examining each piece under a high-powered microscope, the researchers discovered that the ancient silk threads share several features common to modern spider webs, including droplets of sticky glue used to hold the web together and capture prey.

According to paleobiologist Martin Brasier of Oxford University, the gooey droplets suggest that spiders were starting to spin webs that werebetter adapted for catching flying insects. "Interestingly, a huge radiation took place in flying insects and bark beetles about 140-130 million years ago," Brasier wrote in an email to Wired.com. "So we may be seeing a co-evolution of spiders and insects here."

The new discovery is the first example of an amber fossil from the early Cretaceous period, when dinosaurs like spinosaurs and psittocosaurs roamed the Earth.

spider-16x-20"Silk is a relatively delicate material and it is rarely preserved in the fossil record, except when entombed in amber," Brasier and colleagues wrote about the discovery in the upcoming December issueof the Journal of the Geological Society. The researchers think pieces of organic material, including the spider silk, became embalmed during a severe wildfire, when amber resins seeped out from the charred bark of coniferous trees and were eventually swept away by flooding.

In addition to ancient spider silk, the amber chunk contains well-preserved soil microbes, including the oldest known examples of actinobacteria, a common type of bacteria that plays a major role in soil formation.

Image 1: A spider and web trapped in amber, Mila Zinkova/Wikipedia Commons. Image 2: Light micrograph of new amber fossil showing a web of tiny silk threads, plus droplets of sticky glue. Courtesy of Martin Brasier.

See Also:

Follow us on Twitter @wiredscience, and on Facebook.

AI Spacesuits Turn Astronauts Into Cyborg Biologists

Posted: 02 Nov 2009 10:55 AM PST

cyborgastrobio

Equipped with wearable AI systems and digital eyes that see what human eyes can't, space explorers of the future could be not just astronauts, but "cyborg astrobiologists."

That's the vision of a research team led by Patrick McGuire, a University of Chicago geoscientist who's developed algorithms that can recognize signs of life in a barren landscape.

"When they look at scenery, children gravitate towards the thing that's different from the other things," said McGuire. "That's how I looked at the cyborg astrobiologist."

At the heart of McGuire's system is a Hopfield neural network, a type of artificial intelligence that compares incoming data against patterns it's seen before, eventually picking out those details that qualify as new or unusual.

As described in a paper published Thursday in arXiv, the system successfully differentiates lichen from surrounding rock — a proof-of-principle test that lays the foundation for adding other types of data.

For the last several years, McGuire worked on CRISM, a Mars-orbiting imager that detects infrared and other invisible-to-human-eye wavelengths of light, allowing it to identify different types of rock and soil. McGuire envisions the digital eyes of cyborg astrobiologists as scaled-down versions of CRISM, their data perpetually crunched by the Hopfield networks on their hips.

"You would have a very complex artificial intelligence system, with access to different remote sensing databases, to field work that's been done before in the area, and it would have the ability to reason about these in human-like ways," said McGuire.

cyborgastrobio2The lichen tests were conducted in Spain and at Utah's Mars Desert Research Station, where two of the researchers donned spacesuits and lived for two weeks in the field as astronauts. They carried hand-held digital microscopes and cell phone cameras, which sent the data via bluetooth to netbooks running McGuire's Hopfield network.

The lichen identification was based on color data. McGuire next plans to train the network to process different textures. Ultimately he wants to conduct analysis at different scales, from the microscopic up to landscape-wide.

McGuire cautioned that his team's system is "nowhere near" its ready-for-Mars ideal, and it will likely be decades before people explore the surface of Mars in person. In the meantime, cyborg astrobiologists might search the South Pole for Martian meteorites, and feature-identifying algorithms could be uploaded to Mars-roving robots.

"Then you'd have a robotic astrobiologist, and the humans would be back here on Earth, in Mission Control," he said. "The algorithms help us out, but humans are ultimately responsible."

Images: Patrick McGuire

See Also:

Citation: "The Cyborg Astrobiologist: Testing a Novelty-Detection Algorithm on Two Mobile Exploration Systems at Rivas Vaciamadrid in Spain and at the Mars Desert Research Station in Utah." P.C. McGuire, C. Gross, L. Wendt1, A. Bonnici, V. Souza-Egipsy, J. Ormö, E. Díaz-Martínez, B.H. Foing, R. Bose, S. Walter, M. Oesker, J. Ontrup, R. Haschke, H. Ritter. arXiv, October 29, 2009.

Brandon Keim's Twitter stream and reportorial outtakes; Wired Science on Twitter. Brandon is currently working on a book about ecosystem and planetary tipping points.